Wednesday, 15 June 2016

Poland GDP Q1 2016


Growth slows to over-two-year low in Q1
June 1, 2016

Poland’s economy started the year on a soft note according to recent data released by the Central Statistical Office of Poland. The economy grew 3.0% over the same period last year in Q1, which was notably below the 4.3% expansion tallied in Q4 2015. The result marked the slowest growth rate since Q4 2013 and came amid an almost-broad-based decline in the economy.

On the domestic side of the economy, a sharp slowdown in public investment on the back of reduced EU development funds hampered growth in Poland. Fixed investment swung from a 4.4% increase in Q4 to a 1.8% contraction in Q1, which marked the worst result since Q2 2013. Government spending also deteriorated, slowing from an 8.7% expansion in Q4 to a 4.4% increase in Q1. However, private consumption improved slightly and grew 3.0% (Q4: +3.0% year-on-year). Private consumption has been the driver of Poland’s solid growth in recent quarters and is expected to pick up going forward amid improving labor market conditions, tax breaks and the government’s new child benefit program. In addition, inventories contributed positively to GDP.

Surging import growth, which expanded at the fastest pace in over one year, led to a larger drag from the external sector in Q1. Import growth rose from Q4’s 8.6% to 9.3% in Q1, as strong household demand translates into increased demand for foreign goods. Exports, however, decelerated in Q1, growing 6.9% (Q4: +8.2% yoy).

Despite the weak reading in the first quarter, Poland’s economy is expected to grow robustly this year driven by strong fundamentals. Jakub Rybacki, Economist at ING, points out:

“We remain optimistic about the second half of the year. Consumption should accelerate strongly in 3Q16 as the child benefit programme would fully impact the economy. Moreover, we expect increased tourist inflow due to the World Youth Day (Jul-16 in Cracow). Thus we see GDP growth around 3.7% YoY in 2H16.”

FocusEconomics Consensus Forecast panelists expect that the economy will expand 3.6% in 2016, which is unchanged from last month’s forecast. For 2017, panelists foresee the economy growing 3.5%.

Poland GDP Chart



Note: Year-on-year changes of GDP in %.
Source: Central Statistical Office (GUS) and FocusEconomics Consensus Forecast. 
Poland Inflation May 2016


Fall in annual consumer prices moderates slightly in May
May 31, 2016

According to a preliminary estimate released by the Central Statistical Office (GUS) on 31 May, consumer prices in May increased 0.1% over the previous month, which was below the 0.3% increase recorded in April and expected by market analysts.

In annual terms, consumer prices dropped 1.0% in May, which followed the 1.1% fall recorded in April. However, inflation remains well below the Central Bank’s target of 2.5% with a tolerance margin of plus/minus 1.0 percentage point. Meanwhile, annual average inflation stabilized at April’s minus 0.8%. More detailed data concerning consumer prices will be published on 13 June.

FocusEconomics Consensus Forecast panelists expect consumer prices to fall 0.3% in 2016, which is unchanged from last month’s projection. In 2017, the panel expects inflation to average 1.5%.


Poland Inflation Chart



Note: Annual and monthly variation of consumer price index in %.
Source: Central Statistical Office (GUS). 
Poland PMI May 2016


Manufacturing PMI rises in May
June 1, 2016

The manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) rose from April’s 51.0 to 52.1 in May, according to a release provided by Markit. As a result, the index lies further above the 50-threshold that separates expansion from contraction in the manufacturing sector.

May’s reading mainly reflected across-the-board improvements as growth in output, new orders and employment picked-up pace. Markit noted that, “the other key takeaway from May’s survey was the resumption of input price inflation following a survey-record eight-month sequence of falling purchase prices in the sector. Moreover, the rate of inflation was the fastest since October 2013.”

FocusEconomics Consensus Forecast panelists expect fixed investment to expand 4.5% in 2016, which is down 0.1 percentage points from last month’s estimate. For 2017, the panel sees fixed investment expanding 5.1%.

Poland PMI Chart



Note: Markit Poland Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index. Readings above 50 indicate an expansion in the manufacturing sector while readings below 50 indicate a contraction.
Source: Markit. 
Poland Business Confidence May 2016

Business confidence edges down in May
May 25, 2016

The manufacturing sector business climate index fell from 5.4 points in April to 5.0 points in May, according to the Central Statistical Office’s Business Tendency Survey (GUS-BTS). Despite the fall, business confidence remains above the zero-point threshold that separates optimism from pessimism.

May’s decrease reflected deterioration across the majority of categories that comprise the index. Firms’ were less optimistic regarding the future general economic situation and employment prospects.

FocusEconomics Consensus Forecast panelists expect fixed investment to expand 4.7% in 2016, which is up 0.1 percentage points from last month’s estimate. For 2017, the panel sees fixed investment expanding 5.1%.

Poland Business Confidence Chart



Note: Value of month-on-month business confidence index. An index value above 0 indicates a positive assessment of the business climate while a value below 0 indicates a negative assessment.
Source: Central Statistical Office (GUS). 
Poland Economic Outlook

Poland’s economy started 2016 on a weak footing as in Q1 GDP expanded at the slowest pace in over two years. Fixed investment deteriorated notably on the back of reduced EU funds, public spending decelerated and the external sector weakened in Q1. Conversely, private consumption, which has been the backbone of Poland’s strong performance in recent quarters, remained solid. Data from April and May were more encouraging and point to a pickup in Q2. In April, industrial production and retail sales strengthened notably, while the unemployment rate continued to fall. Businesses remained confident and the PMI pointed to expansionary conditions in May. Meanwhile, Moody’s decision in May to cut the outlook on Poland’s A2 credit rating from stable to negative represents a setback for the economy. Moody’s main reasons for the cut were increasing fiscal risks due to a notable rise in expenditures and that the new Government’s shift to less predictable policies and legislation have led to a weaker investment climate.


Poland Economy Data

  •                                          2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
  • Population (million).   38.1 38.1 38.1 38.0 38.0
  • GDP per capita (EUR)      9,987 10,233 10,372 - - 
  • GDP (EUR bn)                    380 390 395 - - 
  • Economic Growth (GDP, annual variation in %) 5.0 1.7 1.2 - - 
  • Domestic Demand (annual variation in %) 4.2 -0.5 -0.7 - - 
  • Consumption (annual variation in %) 3.3 0.8 0.2 - - 
  • Investment (annual variation in %) 8.8 -1.8 -1.1 - - 
  • Industrial Production (annual variation in %) 6.8 1.4 2.4 - - 
  • Retail Sales (annual variation in %) 11.2 6.4 2.4 - - 
  • Unemployment Rate 12.5 13.4 13.4 - - 
  • Fiscal Balance (% of GDP) -4.9 -3.7 -4.0 - - 
  • Public Debt (% of GDP) 54.4 54.0 56.0 - - 
  • Money (annual variation in %) 11.5 4.2 6.7 - - 
  • Inflation Rate (CPI, annual variation in %, eop) 4.6 2.4 0.7 - - 
  • Inflation Rate (HICP, annual variation in %) 3.9 3.7 0.8 - - 
  • Inflation (PPI, annual variation in %) 8.4 -1.0 -0.9 - - 
  • Policy Interest Rate (%) 4.50 4.25 2.50 - - 
  • Stock Market (annual variation in %) -20.8 26.2 8.1 - - 
  • Exchange Rate (vs EUR) 4.47 4.08 4.15 - - 
  • Exchange Rate (vs EUR, aop) 4.12 4.18 4.20 - - 
  • Current Account (% of GDP) -5.2 -3.7 -1.3 - - 
  • Current Account Balance (EUR bn) -19.7 -14.4 -5.0 - - 
  • Trade Balance (EUR billion) -13.3 -8.1 -0.3 - - 
  • Exports (EUR billion) 132 141 149 - - 
  • Imports (EUR billion) 146 149 149 - - 
  • Exports (annual variation in %) 12.2 -1.6 9.2 - - 
  • Imports (annual variation in %) 13.5 -5.5 3.5 - - 
  • International Reserves (EUR) 75.7 82.6 77.1 - - 
  • External Debt (% of GDP) 61.3 73.7 73.3 - -

Poland Economic Growth


Poland’s economy is set for another fast expansion this year thanks to its solid economic fundamentals. However, uncertainties surrounding the new government’s policies represent a downside risk. Our panelists expect the economy to expand 3.6% in 2016, which is unchanged from last month’s forecast. For 2017, the panel sees economic growth broadly stable at 3.5%.
Poland overview

Poland has grown rapidly over the last 25 years. The country’s gross domestic product (GDP) has doubled in size (measured in real times). GDP per capita (at PPP) has moved from 32% to over 60% of the Western Europe. Annual GDP growth between 1991-2008 equaled to remarkable level of nearly 5%. Today Poland is the eight-largest economy in the European Union in real GDP terms, with buoyant private sector, internationally competitive export-oriented companies, as well as well-educated and skilled people.

Strong economic growth has translated into significant welfare gains across the entire society, but benefits have not been shared equally. While Poland weathered the 2008 global financial crisis better than its neighbors, per capita income growth for the bottom 40 percent has fallen behind the growth rate for the entire population.

Moreover, a significant number of people in Poland is vulnerable to changes in economic circumstances. In recent years, Poland has also seen a moderate increase in the extreme poverty rate, which reached 7 percent in 2014. There is also a clear regional divide, with eastern and central sub-regions characterized by higher poverty than western sub-regions, while big cities, on the other hand, are areas with the lowest levels of poverty, providing scope to address poverty in lagging regions.


Poland’s challenge is to accelerate growth and make sure it is inclusive in the context of rapid population aging and accelerating technological change. The response to both challenges is to focus on policies to both boost productivity and enhance the opportunities for people to work. Investing in people, promoting a dynamic and innovative business environment, building supportive infrastructure and strengthening public sector institutions are important and mutually reinforcing ingredients. Investing in people, if done right, will help safeguard growth while the population ages, and ensure the benefits are shared among all citizens.

Strategy

The World Bank Group’s role in Poland has changed over the years. In the 1990s and early 2000s, the World Bank Group had a large lending and analytical program in a broad range of sectors. With the country’s admission into the European Union (EU) in 2004, the situation changed significantly. In financial terms, IBRD’s annual lending represents a fraction of EU grants and European Investment Bank (EIB) operations.

The World Bank’s  Country Partnership Strategy for Poland (CPS) 2014- 2017 was presented to the Board in August 2013 and has the two-fold aim of: (i) fostering sustainable income growth for the bottom 40 percent of the population within the context of Poland's economic convergence process within the EU; and (ii) supporting Poland's emerging role as a global development partner. The WBG program is expected to remain very selective and demand-driven. It will rest on four strategic engagement areas, which are aligned with the "Europe 2020" strategic agenda of smart, sustainable, and inclusive growth and with the national development strategy. These four areas are:

economic competitiveness
equity and inclusion
climate action
Poland as a global development partner
The CPS is informed by the overall strategic goals of the World Bank Group. In a country like Poland, where extreme poverty is marginal, the WBG program is aimed at promoting shared prosperity - boosting economic competitiveness, economic growth in a difficult external environment,  and equity and inclusion in order to ensure that the benefits of growth are enjoyed by the bottom 40% of the population - and climate action, designed to support the sustainability of Poland's economic and social development. The CPS is also aligned with the Europe and Central Asia (ECA) Regional goals.


The recent lending program has been anchored around a successive programmatic series of Development Policy Loans in support of Government reforms in public finance, labor markets and social sectors, and private sector development. The new series is focused on resilience and growth and the first operation is scheduled to go to the World Bank Board on May 22, 2014. In parallel, the investment portfolio in the country has gradually shrunk, with only one project remaining under implementation (on flood prevention along the Odra River).

Analytical and Advisory Assistance (AAA) Program.  The World Bank program is largely based on “knowledge products” – analyses and advisory services, in part reimbursed by the Government. The authorities value their partnership with the World Bank as a way to access global knowledge in specific technical “niches” (e.g. on the Bank’s resolution framework, innovation and competitiveness, climate change modeling, infrastructure financing, etc.). This serves several purposes, including informing policy debates and facilitating the design or implementation of technical reforms.

Examples of such work include: 

support on Doing Business, which is provided across several ministries (on insolvency, contract enforcement, access to electricity, etc.);

dialogue on innovation and smart specialization, with a series of engagements with the Ministry of Infrastructure and Development, the National Center for Innovation and Development, the Polish Agency for Enterprise Development, and some regional authorities;

support to the development of a macroeconomic model to assess the economy-wide impact of climate change-related policy decisions;

analytical work on aging (healthy, active, and prosperous aging), and on savings and growth (in a context of aging);

support to the Ministry of Finance on issues such as forecasting for subnational governments and macroeconomic analysis as part of preparation for an eventual adoption of the euro;

development of financial instruments  in the energy efficiency and waste management sectors;


financial reporting (funded by the Government of Switzerland).

Result

Poland joined the World Bank in 1946 as a founding member, and then withdrew in 1950 before re-joining the institution in 1986. The Bank provided significant analytical and advisory services, as well as (starting in 1990) substantial financial resources. This assistance has totaled $7.1 billion for 64 projects in areas such as environmental health, transportation and infrastructure, state-owned enterprise restructuring and privatization, energy efficiency and climate change mitigation.

There is a broad consensus that World Bank support was instrumental in supporting Poland’s successful economic transformation, its adoption of a market economy system, and its continued progress and economic and social growth since the early 1990s. This has translated into a large increase in incomes and living standards, in an environment of limited inequalities.

Recent results from knowledge services include:

Supporting Transition Toward a Low-Carbon Future
In late 2008, Poland engaged in implementing new EU policies on climate change mitigation: a 20% reduction in emissions by 2020, an increase to 20% for energy consumption coming from renewable energy, and a 20% improvement in energy efficiency. At the request of the government, the World Bank produced the report “Transition to a Low Emissions Economy in Poland,” which has been widely disseminated by the government. The analysis influenced the government’s Guidelines to the National Program of Greenhouse Gas Abatement in Poland, adopted in August 2011. Government officials and local experts have applied innovative, economy-wide models to address critical economic questions, such as carbon leakage and competitiveness and the distributional effects of climate policies.

Recent results from financial support include: 

Bringing People Out of Isolation in Rural Poland
In rural Poland, relatively limited access to services has left some people isolated and excluded. The Poland Post Accession Rural Support Project (PARSP) has delivered assistance to selected rural communities and vulnerable groups—especially youth, the elderly, and the disabled— to directly tackle this isolation. Under the Social Inclusion Program (SIP), over 10,500 contracts worth €36 million have been signed with local service providers to provide innovative social services to marginalized groups, thereby strengthening the capacity of 500 rural social services offices.

New kindergartens, women's groups and village associations have sprung up with cooking demonstrations and folk dancing groups. There are new activities for the disabled—many of whom had not been able to participate before. There are music programs and sports for youth. Seniors go on outings to parks and museums. Villagers connect more with one another and the wider world. Projects do not only build roads or hospitals, they also build human connections and create inspiration for people to reach out to others and improve their lives.

Promoting Safe Polish Roads
As part of the Poland Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program, the World Bank supported the planning and execution of a drivers’ safety campaign and new road safety measures. The project worked to develop a sustainable and balanced safety system between drivers, pedestrians and road conditions.

New road signs, crosswalks and traffic lights were installed on some major Polish roads, along new local driveways that were built off the highways to make the lives of local communities easier. For example, thanks to some new local driveways children can get on and off school buses inside school property instead of dodging lanes of traffic. Crosswalks on some of the national roads are now brightly lit at night thanks to an innovative solar systems, allowing drivers and pedestrians to see better at night and reducing the number of car accidents.


In addition to promoting safety, the project improved roads, increased the effectiveness of staff responsible for fixing and maintaining roads and highways, and established funding for maintenance. The percentage of Polish national roads that are in good condition increased from 49% in 2005 to nearly 60% in 2011. The length of the road network that can handle heavy trucks has more than doubled, significantly exceeding its target.

Tuesday, 14 June 2016

How Poland Became Europe's Most Dynamic Economy

The former communist country stands out as an unlikely island of economic success amid a recovering Europe

The oldest coffee shop in Warsaw has been in operation nearly without interruption since the end of the 18th century. In the upstairs room, a young Frédéric Chopin played one of his last concerts before emigrating to Paris. During the Nazi occupation from 1939 to 1945, the cafe was strictly for Germans. When the city rose up at the end of the war, the building, like much of the old city around it, was completely destroyed—then reconstructed from photographs in the years following. The cafe was state-owned under communism and privatized in 1989 after the fall of the Iron Curtain, sold to a journalist and a jazz musician. “And now,” says Polish businessman Adam Ringer, sitting in the cafe in early October, “it’s been bought by an international company.”

Ringer, 64, reopened the cafe earlier this year under the name Green Caffè Nero, a coffee chain co-owned by Ringer, another Polish partner, and the U.K.-based chain Caffe Nero. “Here you have the whole history of Poland,” he says. “Look at that wall. Each brick is different. They were gathered from the ruins of prewar Warsaw.” Although they’re always aware of the past, Ringer and his countrymen are charging ahead. Revenue at most of his chain’s locations is up 10 percent from the year before, and the company is in the midst of a rapid expansion. “People are much richer than they were, and you can easily feel it,” he says.

With much of Europe still struggling to recover from the impact of the 2008 financial crisis, Poland stands out as an unlikely island of economic success, a place where companies and individuals plan for growth rather than decline. In 2009, when the gross domestic product of the European Union contracted by 4.5 percent, Poland was the only country in the union to see its economy grow, by 1.6 percent. The EU economy as a whole remains smaller than it was at the beginning of 2009 and isn’t expected to recover its losses until the end of next year. In that same period, Poland is projected to enjoy a cumulative growth of more than 16 percent. “Poland didn’t feel the crisis, really,” says Ringer.
There are various reasons Poland, a country of 38.5 million with more than 200 years of tragic history, suddenly finds itself in a position of envy. It has a large internal economy, a business-friendly political class, and the hypercharged potential of a developing country catching up with its western peers. It is playing an increasingly influential role in EU negotiations, often providing a voice of restraint during discussions on how to rebalance an off-kilter euro zone.
The secrets of Poland’s resiliency trace back to the postcommunist era, when its leaders pushed through a set of painful but ultimately effective reforms. Two decades later, the country benefited from an infusion of foreign assistance at the precise moment other EU members were getting clobbered by the financial crisis. The story of the Polish miracle is a testament to the importance of prudent policymaking—but it’s just as much about luck. 


“I remember how it was 20 years ago,” says Ringer. “Gray, dirty, with nervous people, always running.” The street outside his cafe, until recently a tarmac thoroughfare, is now a narrow cobblestone lane flanked by wide sidewalks, where in the evening tourists mingle with students from the nearby university. A 20-minute walk away stands what was once the headquarters of Poland’s Communist party, squatting over a small city block. From 1991 to 2000 it was home to the Warsaw Stock Exchange. Today a Ferrari dealership neighbors a Montblanc outlet.

Since the fall of the Iron Curtain, Poland has refashioned itself as a model of free-market economics. From 1989 to 2007 its economy grew 177 percent, outpacing its Central and Eastern European neighbors as it nearly tripled in size—the result of a series of aggressive measures taken by the government after the collapse of communism. Price controls were lifted, government wages were capped, trade was liberalized, and the Polish currency, the zloty, was made convertible. The policies left millions out of work but freed Poland to begin to recover from decades of mismanagement. The economy got a further boost with the country’s entry into the EU in 2004.

At the onset of the global financial crisis, Poland’s burden of public debt was below 50 percent of GDP, low compared with many European countries—in part the result of a clause in its 1997 constitution limiting government borrowing to 60 percent of GDP. Individual and corporate debt was relatively restrained, kept in check by strict financial regulation and a cultural aversion to borrowing. “Which countries suffered the biggest busts?” says Leszek Balcerowicz, an economist and former deputy prime minister who was the architect for the country’s most important reforms. “Those that previously had the booms. One of the main reasons why we did not suffer a recession is because we didn’t allow the boom to develop.”

Private borrowing had begun to edge up in the two years before the crisis, but not so much that when the bottom dropped out of the global credit market, companies or individuals found themselves dangerously in the red. “We were late to the party,” says Marcin Piatkowski, an economics professor at Warsaw’s Kozminski University. “And it was over before we had time to get drunk.”
Many of the characteristics of the Polish economy are shared by its Central and Eastern European neighbors, all of whom suffered deep if not catastrophic recessions in the early years of the crisis. Poland, though, had an additional advantage: It was the beneficiary of an almost accidental Keynesian stimulus that arrived just in time, boosting domestic consumption and saving the economy. “While other countries followed policies of austerity, government spending in Poland actually went up,” says Gavin Rae, a professor at Kozminski University in Warsaw and author of Poland’s Return to Capitalism. “At the point of the crisis, the foot was put on the pedal.”
A series of tax cuts, including a drop in Poland’s top rate from 40 percent to 32 percent, took effect just as the crisis’s first shock waves were sweeping the world. Meanwhile, the EU budget for 2007-2013—which, among other things, distributes aid from richer countries to the union’s poorer members—made Poland the biggest beneficiary of subsidies, showering the country with some €101.5 billion ($137 billion). Although it was not labeled a stimulus package, Poland’s combination of increased spending and tax cuts was half again as large in per capita terms as the U.S.’s $800 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
Poland spent it quickly. The country had been elected along with Ukraine to host the 2012 European soccer championships, one of the biggest events in world sports. Polish officials from city councilmen to the president were eager to use the tournament as a national showcase, adding government spending to the incoming funds. The result was transformative. All across Poland, large cities and small towns underwent much-needed makeovers. In addition to new stadiums, everything from rail stations to city squares to airports were upgraded. Before the recent surge of infrastructure, Poles like to say, the country’s only real highway was the one built by Adolf Hitler. Stretching from the western town of Wroclaw to the border with Germany, it was once known as the longest staircase in Europe for the sensation caused by driving over its disjointed concrete slabs.
For older Poles such as Ringer, who can remember the way things used to be, the contrast can be breathtaking. Even those too young to have lived under communism feel a palpable sense of acceleration. “It’s hard to imagine how things were compared to what we have right now,” says Grzegorz Inglot, executive adviser to the board of directors of Inglot, a major Polish cosmetics company. At 23, he was born the year after the fall of the Berlin Wall. “Poland is growing year by year,” he says. “New investments, new roads, new buildings. It’s just more of everything.”

In the Continent’s other capitals, shopping centers usually rise on the periphery, squeezed out of the centers by property prices and existing buildings. In Poland, wartime destruction and communist-era stagnation have left plenty of unused or underutilized lots ripe for redevelopment. Warsaw’s iconic Palace of Culture and Science, a Stalinist skyscraper built by the Soviet Union in the 1950s, is flanked on both sides by shopping centers, offering brands ranging from Guess?, Hugo Boss, and H&M to Nike, Adidas, and Timberland—not to mention Burger King, Subway, KFC, and McDonald’s. “We’ve had 20 years of transformation and growth, but we still have to catch up,” says Leszek Baj, a business reporter at the daily newspaper Gazeta Wyborcza. Adds his colleague, Patrycja Maciejewicz: “We want to buy what everybody in Europe is buying.”


Even as subsidies from the EU fueled its growth, Poland has benefited from remaining outside the common currency. From September 2008 to February 2009, the zloty lost about a third of its value relative to the euro, before stabilizing later that year at about 70 percent of its peak value. The resulting boost in global competitiveness for Polish companies quickly accomplished a rebalancing that the euro area’s weaker economies are still struggling to achieve. Measured in euros, the value of Polish exports dropped 15.5 percent from 2008 to 2009—but in zloty terms it grew 4.4 percent.
The drop in the zloty not only made Polish exports more competitive but also raised the relative cost of imports. The result was a boon for local companies, which increasingly are concentrating on quality. Standing in the Inglot flagship store in the upscale Galeria Mokotów mall in Warsaw, Greg Inglot says his company “felt a little slowdown, but it was nothing big. Our numbers were going up year to year.” Inglot, which produces 95 percent of its cosmetics in Polish factories near the Ukraine border, has continued a rapid domestic expansion, opening 113 stores since 2009, most of them in new shopping malls. The company opened its first flagship store in the U.S. in 2009, in New York’s Times Square. It now has 31 locations in the U.S. and outlets in 50 countries, including Belarus, Dubai, Guatemala, Malaysia, and the Philippines.
As Poles have gotten wealthier, their tastes have grown more sophisticated. Three years ago, when Jacek Rusiecki and his brother Michal opened their restaurant in the town of Jawor, not far from the border with the Czech Republic, the beer market was dominated by multinational breweries marketing mass-produced Polish brands. Theirs was the only establishment to introduce beers from the country’s rapidly multiplying microbreweries. “Now they’re all over the place,” says Michal, 31. Poles of their generation are starting to demand the quality products sought by consumers across much of the rest of Europe. “Our parents remember a time when somebody high up [in the Communist Party] knew better than they did how the beer should taste,” says Jacek, 28. Adds Michal, “We’re coming back to explore the tastes that were here before the World Wars.”
“The consumer has changed,” says Małgorzata Starczewska-Krzysztoszek, chief economist at Lewiathan, Poland’s private employer’s confederation. “They want to have good quality for a good price.” When Starczewska-Krzysztoszek surveyed small and medium enterprises in 2009, 60 percent of respondents said they were planning to compete on price and nothing else. “I was very worried,” she says. “I tried to explain that we can’t compete with China and India.” In 2012, when she ran the numbers again, only 10.6 percent said they planned to compete on price. Nearly half said they were focused on quality.

Despite its expansion, Poland hasn’t been totally shielded from the vicissitudes of the business cycle. A slight rise in unemployment in 2012, coming not long after the Euro Cup splurge, led to a sudden plunge in consumer spending. Many construction companies had drastically underbid for Poland’s infrastructure projects, leading the industry to slip into recession.
Cities found themselves with giant modern stadiums but no plans to fill them. The stadiums are largely unprofitable, pulling in too little through conferences, concerts, and the occasional game to pay for their maintenance, much less to pay down the loans that were taken to fund them. “The spending gave the economy a boost, but in the long term it wasn’t necessarily a wise investment for the country,” says Rae.
Poland also must address some long-deferred fiscal challenges. The government is pushing up against the constitutional debt limit and is desperate for funds. Many Poles say a recent change to the pension system, in which privately held funds are being transferred into the state system, is motivated by an effort to shore up the balance sheets. “They’ve done a lot of creative accounting to keep the deficit down,” says Andrew Kureth, editor-in-chief of the Warsaw Business Journal, an English-language newsweekly. Unemployment remains stubbornly high at 10.3 percent; among the young, the figure is 26 percent. In September the country’s trade unions organized one of the largest demonstrations since 1989, protesting working conditions. Prime Minister Donald Tusk recently reshuffled his cabinet, fired his finance minister, and pledged “an acceleration of economic growth.”

Despite some inevitable problems, Poles have reason to remain optimistic. Growth next year is projected to be 2.5 percent, driven in part by a recovery in parts of the EU, especially Germany, the destination of more than 25 percent of Polish exports. The EU budget for 2014-2020 was the first in the union’s history that saw cuts in total spending, but the money allocated to Poland rose nonetheless. Because of a mix of factors—including its size and proximity to Germany, the EU’s biggest economy—Poland is eligible for €105.8 billion, making it once again the biggest beneficiary among member states. The funds are expected to start flowing by the end of 2014.
It isn’t just money that’s pouring in. In addition to Green Caffè Nero, Ringer runs a training center that helps doctors prepare for positions across Europe. When he started 13 years ago, the students were almost exclusively Poles. In recent years, as Polish doctors began to receive attractive wages at home, the school has suddenly found itself catering to Greeks, Spaniards, Portuguese, and Croatians. “Can you imagine a Greek doctor coming to Warsaw to learn Norwegian and then moving to Western Europe?” says Ringer. “That’s the European Union right there.” And Poland is one place where, for now, anything seems possible.